Problems in deceptive medical procedures: an ethical and legal analysis of the administration of placebos

Journal of Medical Ethics 4 (4):172-181 (1978)

The use of placebos in therapy or research poses ethical questions. What are the benefits and the costs in ethical terms of condoning deception of the patient or subject? What does the deception mean for the patient's or subject's right to give informed consent to his treatment? Doctors are rightly expected to disclose to their patient facts which would in their judgement best enable him to give informed consent to treatment. On occasion, the degree of this disclosure may be limited by the need to avoid hazarding the success of treatment of an unstable patient whose condition threatens his life, but doctors should have no right to withhold information just to prevent a patient refusing consent to therapy. No such limitation should apply in experiments where full disclosure must operate to enable the subject to give his informed consent. The potential medical benefits for the patient of placebo therapy have to be weighed against all the ethical costs of the deception and dishonesty involved, including the longer term repercussions on doctor/patient trust: similar ethical costs may arise in experiments involving the use of placebos without disclosure of this as a possibility to the subject. Deception is ethically degrading to both parties not only being a breach of trust, but denying the moral autonomy of the patient or subject to make his own choice. The writer concludes that placebos should be used only with full disclosure and consent whether in therapy or in research, and that this need not impede the success of either.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.4.4.172
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,395
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Classical Medicine V Alternative Medical Practices.M. H. Kottow - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1):18-22.
Philosophy of Medicine in the United Kingdom.David Lamb & Susan M. Easton - 1982 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (1):3-34.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What It Takes to Defend Deceptive Placebo Use.Anne Barnhill - 2011 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (3):219-250.
A Limited Defense of Clinical Placebo Deception.Adam J. Kolber - 2007 - Yale Law & Policy Review 26:75-134.
The Extent of Public Interest in Medical-Ethical-Legal Problems.B. Towers - 1980 - Journal of Medical Ethics 6 (4):202-204.
Teaching Medical Law in Medical Education.Rebecca S. Y. Wong & Usharani Balasingam - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (2):121-138.
Ethical and Legal Aspects in Teaching Students of Medicine.Pawel Wlasienko - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):75-80.
What You Don't Know Can Help You: The Ethics of Placebo Treatment.Daniel Groll - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (2):188-202.


Added to PP index

Total views
11 ( #738,940 of 2,291,347 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #825,549 of 2,291,347 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature