Rights and territories: A reply to Nine, Miller, and Stilz


Authors
A. John Simmons
University of Virginia
Abstract
‘Rights and Territories: A Reply to Nine, Miller, and Stilz’ defends the Lockean theory of states’ territorial rights against the critiques of Nine, Miller, and Stilz. In response to Nine’s concern that such a Lockean theory cannot justify the right of legitimate states to exclude aliens, it is argued that a consent-based theory like the Lockean one is flexible enough to justify a wide range of possible incidents of territorial rights – importantly including, though not necessarily including, the sort of right to exclude aliens that is familiar from actual political practice. Miller’s criticisms are more wide-ranging. In response, the article argues that Lockean labor-based property rights are both stronger and more enduring than Miller suggests and that nationalism’s resources for dealing with concerns about rights-supersession and trapped minorities are importantly overstated by Miller. Against Stilz’s Kantian, ‘presentist’ account of states’ authority over persons and territories, it is argued that the rectification of past wrongs remains morally crucial even in the context of otherwise-just societies and that Stilz’s Kantian/rawlsian position unconvincingly privileges the rights to autonomy of territorially concentrated groups over those of dissenting individuals or wrongfully dispersed groups.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/1470594x19889419
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Lockeans Versus Nationalists on Territorial Rights.David Miller - 2019 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 18 (4):323-335.
Boundaries of Authority.A. John Simmons - 2016 - Oxford University Press USA.
The Mystery of Territory.Fernando R. Tesón - 2015 - Social Philosophy and Policy 32 (1):25-50.
Attachment to Territory: Status or Achievement?Avery Kolers - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):101-123.
Kamm and Miller on Rights' Compatibility.Rowan Cruft - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):393 - 401.
La justification des droits juridictionnels.Daniel Kofman - 2012 - Philosophiques 39 (2):379-392.
Rights, Justice and War: A Reply.Cécile Fabre - 2014 - Law and Philosophy 33 (3):391-425.
Lockean Property and Literary Works.Jonathan Peterson - 2008 - Legal Theory 14 (4):257-280.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-01-25

Total views
1 ( #1,381,011 of 2,286,099 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #835,155 of 2,286,099 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature