Semantics and pragmatics in the interpretation of or

Abstract

This paper concerns what might be called the variably bad behavior of the word or. As is well known, there are a variety of environments in which the word or misbehaves – misbehaves, in the sense that it gives rise to interpretations which are not expected given the standard analysis of this word as, roughly, set union. One of these environments is the scope of a modal. This case has received a lot of attention recently in the literature, and a number of researchers, including myself, have proposed accounts of or which explain its behavior in this environment.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,925

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Quinean predicativism.Michael Rieppel - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (1):23-44.
On the Meaning of 'Ought'.Matthew Chrisman - 2009 - In Russ Shafer-Landau, Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume Four. Oxford University Press. pp. 304.
Sensitivity.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - In Knowledge and its limits. New York: Oxford University Press.
How to Speak the Truth.Timothy A. O. Endicott - 2001 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 46 (1):229-248.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
25 (#973,457)

6 months
25 (#132,193)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mandy Simons
Carnegie Mellon University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references