The Parliament of Things and the Anthropocene: How to Listen to ‘Quasi-Objects’

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (2/3):1-25 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Among the contemporary philosophers using the concept of the Anthropocene, Bruno Latour and Isabelle Stengers are prominent examples. The way they use this concept, however, diverts from the most common understanding of the Anthropocene. In fact, their use of this notion is a continuation of their earlier work around the concept of a ‘parliament of things.’ Although mainly seen as a sociology or philosophy of science, their work can be read as philosophy of technology as well. Similar to Latour’s claim that science is Janus-headed, technology has two faces. Faced with the Anthropocene, we need to shift from technologies of control to technologies of negotiations, i.e., a parliament of things. What, however, does a ‘parliament of things’ mean? This paper wants to clarify what is conceptually at stake by framing Latour’s work within the philosophy of Michel Serres and Isabelle Stengers. Their philosophy implies a ‘postlinguistic turn,’ where one can ‘let things speak in their own name,’ without claiming knowledge of the thing in itself. The distinction between object and subject is abolished to go back to the world of ‘quasi-objects’ (Serres). Based on the philosophy of science of Latour and Stengers the possibility for a politics of quasi-objects or a ‘cosmopolitics’ (Stengers) is opened. It is in this framework that their use of the notion of the Anthropocene must be understood and a different view of technology can be conceptualized.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The Janus Face of Cosmopolitics.Iwona Janicka - 2024 - Philosophy Today 68 (1):129-145.
From the Sacred to the Sacred Object.Edwin Sayes - 2012 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (2):105-122.
Derrida, Stengers, Latour, and Subalternist Cosmopolitics.Matthew C. Watson - 2014 - Theory, Culture and Society 31 (1):75-98.
Latour-Stengers: an entangled flight.Philippe Pignarre - 2023 - Hoboken, NJ, USA: Polity. Edited by Stephen Muecke.
Bruno Latour and the Secularization of Science.Massimiliano Simons - 2019 - Perspectives on Science 27 (6):925-954.
On equal temperament.Michael Halewood - 2015 - History of the Human Sciences 28 (3):3-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-26

Downloads
5,376 (#1,240)

6 months
739 (#1,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Massimiliano Simons
Maastricht University

References found in this work

Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to the Actor-Network Theory.Bruno Latour - 2005 - Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
We have never been modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references