Journal of Business Ethics 96 (3):383 - 401 (2010)
During the last decade, scholars have identified a number of factors that pose significant challenges to effective business ethics education. This article offers a "coping-modeling, problem-solving" (CMPS) approach (Cunningham, 2006) as one option for addressing these concerns. A rationale supporting the use of the CMPS framework for courses on ethical decisionmaking in business is provided, following which the implementation processes for this program are described. Evaluative data collected from N = 101 undergraduate business students enrolled in a third year required course on ethical decision-making in business indicated that the CMPS model is a promising alternative for both overcoming teaching challenges and for facilitating skill acquisition in the areas of ethical recognition, judgment, and action. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed
|Keywords||business ethics education “coping-modeling, problem-solving” ethical decision-making program evaluation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.Richard E. Nisbett & Lee Ross - 1980 - Prentice-Hall.
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business.Robert C. Solomon - 1992 - Oxford University Press.
Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency.Albert Bandura - 2002 - Journal of Moral Education 31 (2):101-119.
Is Classroom Cheating Related to Business Students' Propensity to Cheat in the "Real World"?Raef A. Lawson - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 49 (2):189-199.
Citations of this work BETA
Teaching Business Ethics Online: Perspectives on Course Design, Delivery, Student Engagement, and Assessment. [REVIEW]Denis Collins, James Weber & Rebecca Zambrano - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 125 (3):1-17.
Investigating and Assessing the Quality of Employee Ethics Training Programs Among US-Based Global Organizations.James Weber - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 129 (1):27-42.
How Did You Like This Course? The Advantages and Limitations of Reaction Criteria in Ethics Education.Megan R. Turner, Logan L. Watts, Logan M. Steele, Tyler J. Mulhearn, Brett S. Torrence, E. Michelle Todd, Michael D. Mumford & Shane Connelly - forthcoming - Ethics and Behavior.
Similar books and articles
Meta-Learning About Business Ethics: Building Honorable Business School Communities. [REVIEW]Linda Klebe Trevino & Donald McCabe - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (6):405 - 416.
Moral Imagination in Organizational Problem-Solving.Deborah Vidaver-Cohen - 1997 - Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (4):1-26.
Integrating Ethics Into the Business School Curriculum.Thomas W. Dunfee & Diana C. Robertson - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (11):847 - 859.
Using Programs to Solve Problems: Imitation Versus Insight.Stan A. Kuczaj, John D. Gory & Mark J. Xitco - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):695-696.
Conceptual Tensions Between Theory and Program: The Chromosome Theory and the Mendelian Research Program. [REVIEW]Gerrit Balen - 1987 - Biology and Philosophy 2 (4):435-461.
Everybody Else is Doing It, so Why Can't We? Pluralistic Ignorance and Business Ethics Education.Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben, Anthony R. Wheeler & M. Ronald Buckley - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 56 (4):385 - 398.
Consumer Ethical Beliefs and Personality Traits: An Exploratory Analysis. [REVIEW]Kumar C. Rallapalli, Scott J. Vitell, Frank A. Wiebe & James H. Barnes - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (7):487 - 495.
Added to index2010-04-18
Total downloads16 ( #296,273 of 2,163,987 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #129,103 of 2,163,987 )
How can I increase my downloads?