Why Omissions are Special: A. P. Simester

Legal Theory 1 (3):311-335 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The criminal law presently distinguishes between actions and omissions, and only rarely proscribes failures to avert consequences that it would be an offense to bring about. Why? In recent years it has been persuasively argued by both Glover and Bennett that, celeris paribus, omissions to prevent a harm are just as culpable as are actions which bring that harm about. On the other hand, and acknowledging that hitherto “lawyers have not been very successful in finding a rationale for it,” Tony Honoré has sought to defend the law's differential treatment. He proposes a “distinct-duties theory” that in addition to the general duties we owe to everyone, we also owe distinct duties to a more limited collection of people and associations, specified by features of our relationship with them. Where a distinct duty holds, breach by omission may well be no better than breach by positive action. But absent a distinct duty, omissions, per Honoré, are less culpable. They are mere failures to intervene and improve or rectify things, whereas actions are positive interventions which make things worse. And, thus, the law has good reason to differentiate between them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Metaphysics of Omissions.Sara Bernstein - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (3):208-218.
Acts and Omissions.Alexander Paul Donald - 1990 - Dissertation, University of St. Andrews (United Kingdom)
Moral responsibility for unprevented harm.Friderik Klampfer - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (33):119-161.
What is a Causal Theorist to Do about Omissions?Rebekah L. H. Rice - 2011 - Modern Schoolman 88 (1-2):123-144.
Omissions and other negative actions.Douglas N. Walton - 1980 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1 (3):305-324.
Criminal law theory: doctrines of the general part.Stephen Shute & Andrew Simester (eds.) - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Reference fiction, and omission.Samuel Murray - 2018 - Synthese 195 (1):235-257.
Ability and responsibility for omissions.Randolph Clarke - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 73 (2-3):195 - 208.
Omissions as possibilities.Sara Bernstein - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (1):1-23.
Responsibility, control, and omissions.John Martin Fischer - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (1):45-64.
Omissions, Responsibility, and Symmetry.Randolph Clarke - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (3):594-624.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
137 (#124,979)

6 months
9 (#144,939)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Moral Foundations of Consumer Ethics.Rafi M. M. I. Chowdhury - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 158 (3):585-601.
The Moral Foundations of Consumer Ethics.Rafi M. M. I. Chowdhury - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 158 (3):585-601.
Agents, actions and reasons.Maria Alvarez - 2005 - Philosophical Books 46 (1):45-58.
The Wrongs of Unlawful Immigration.Ana Aliverti - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (2):375-391.
A plea for omissions.Stephen Mathis - 2003 - Criminal Justice Ethics 22 (2):15-31.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Killing, letting die, and simple conflicts.H. M. Malm - 1989 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (3):238-258.
Is common-sense morality self-defeating?Derek Parfit - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (10):533-545.

Add more references