Film-Philosophy 9 (4) (2005)

Robert Sinnerbrink
Macquarie University
he enigmatic films of David Lynch have been interpreted from a variety of perspectives. Among these we can find Lynch the postmodernist ironist, Lynch the transgressive neoconservative, and Lynch the visionary explorer of the unconscious. Martha P. Nochimson's recent study, for example, presents an eloquent case for regarding Lynch as a Jungian 'surfer of the waves of the collective unconscious', whose films combine the intuitive embracing of subconscious Life Energy with a celebration of the creative power of Hollywood mythology. [1] For Nochimson, Lynch's transformation of the masculine action hero into intuitive 'boundary crosser' shows the redemptive quality of his cinematic vision, which we experience sensuously rather than comprehend rationally
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3366/film.2005.0034
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,268
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mulholland Drive.Zina Giannopoulou (ed.) - 2013 - Routledge.
Letting Go of David Lynch.John Bleasdale - 1999 - Film-Philosophy 3 (1).
"Mulholand Drive", di David Lynch.Adriano Bugliani, Umberto Curi & Nicoletta Salomon - 2002 - Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 15 (3):627-640.
Response to Bleasdale.Martha P. Nochimson - 1999 - Film-Philosophy 3 (1).
Response to Lynch.Steve Fuller - 2009 - Spontaneous Generations 3 (1):220-222.
Truth as One and Many.Michael P. Lynch - 2009 - Clarendon Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
43 ( #247,106 of 2,444,964 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #185,844 of 2,444,964 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes