European Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):95-121 (2018)

Authors
Neil Sinclair
Nottingham University
Abstract
This paper examines the prospects for a conceptual or functional role theory of moral concepts. It is argued that such an account is well-placed to explain both the irreducibility and practicality of moral concepts. Several versions of conceptual role semantics for moral concepts are distinguished, depending on whether the concept-constitutive conceptual roles are wide or narrow normative or non-normative and purely doxastic or conative. It is argued that the most plausible version of conceptual role semantics for moral concepts involves only ‘narrow’ conceptual roles, where these include connections to motivational, desire-like, states. In the penultimate section it is argued, contrary to what Wedgwood, Enoch and others have claimed, that such an account of moral concepts cannot plausibly be combined with the claim that moral concepts refer to robust properties. (Published with Open Access.)
Keywords Expressivism  Conceptual Role Semantics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017, 2018
DOI 10.1111/ejop.12191
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Individualism and the Mental.Tyler Burge - 1979 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4 (1):73-122.

View all 76 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Expressivism and Cognitive Propositions.James L. D. Brown - 2019 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5 (3):371-387.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Possessing Moral Concepts.David Merli - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (3):535-556.
Conceptual Role Semantics for Moral Terms.Ralph Wedgwood - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (1):1-30.
Tecendo uma teia: aquisição de conceitos e papel inferencial.John Sarnecki - 2012 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 57 (3):138-162.
The Theory-Theory of Moral Concepts.John Jung Park - 2015 - Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics 3 (2).
Über Begriffe im Recht.Dietmar von der Pfordten - 2012 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 98 (4):439-456.
A Slim Semantics for Thin Moral Terms?Laura Schroeter & Francois Schroeter - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):191 – 207.
Causes as Probability Raisers of Processes.Jonathan Schaffer - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy 98 (2):75-92.
Beliefs and Concepts: Comments on Brian Loar, "Must Beliefs Be Sentences?".Gilbert Harman - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:654 - 661.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-27

Total views
227 ( #34,281 of 2,325,110 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #32,392 of 2,325,110 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes