Emotion Review 3 (3):288-289 (2011)

Authors
Abstract
Instead of arguing about whether moral judgments are based on emotion or reason, moral psychologists should investigate the reliability of moral judgments by checking rates of framing effects in different kinds of moral judgments under different conditions by different people.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1754073911402382
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,514
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Thought.Gilbert Harman & Laurence BonJour - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (2):256.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Defusing the Regress Challenge to Debunking Arguments.Shang Long Yeo - 2020 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (6):785-800.
Ethical Intuitionism and the Linguistic Analogy.Philipp Schwind - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):292-311.
Emotion and Morality: A Tasting Menu.Joshua D. Greene - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (3):227-229.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Emotional Basis of Moral Judgments.Jesse Prinz - 2006 - Philosophical Explorations 9 (1):29-43.
What’s Wrong with Morality?C. Daniel Batson - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (3):230-236.
Are Moral Judgments Unified?Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Thalia Wheatley - 2014 - Philosophical Psychology 27 (4):451-474.
Moral Judgment and Emotions.Kyle Swan - 2004 - Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (3):375-381.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-12-23

Total views
86 ( #110,212 of 2,348,202 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #147,909 of 2,348,202 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes