Is cross-cultural similarity an indicator of similar marketing ethics?

Journal of Business Ethics 32 (1):55 - 68 (2001)

Abstract
This study compares Australian marketers with those in the United States along lines that are particular to the study of ethics. The test measured two different moral philosophies, idealism and relativism, and compared perceptions of ethical problems, ethical intentions, and corporate ethical values. According to Hofstede''s cultural typologies, there should be little difference between American and Australian marketers, but the study did find significant differences. Australians tended to be more idealistic and more relativistic than Americans and the other results were mixed, making it difficult to generalize about the effects of moral philosophies on the components of ethical decision-making measured here. This is an important finding; as firms become increasingly more globalized, marketers will more often be involved in cross-cultural ethical dilemmas and it seems natural to assume that similar cultures will have similar ethical orientations. That assumption may well prove erroneous.
Keywords Philosophy   Ethics   Business Education   Economic Growth   Management
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1010699529874
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,369
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
34 ( #242,720 of 2,255,273 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #580,168 of 2,255,273 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature