K.U. Research Journal of Arts and Humanities (Jan.-Dec.2007):81-86 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The aim of this paper is to critically examine the Ryle’s conception of “Descartes Myth”. Ryle has two objectives in his book The Concept of Mind: (i) to refute a current philosophical theory about mind. (ii) to substitute at least in blue print, a satisfactory alternative. This paper gives a descriptive analysis of what Ryle calls Descartes-Myth and arguments for it. Conclusion of this paper drawn as he does not succeed in dispelling the myth but only substitutes a peculiar logical monism for Descartes’ Myth.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ryle's analysis of mind and matter.Dean Geuras - 1977 - Southwest Philosophical Studies 2 (April):56-59.
Philosophical Mind Studies.Desh Raj Sirswal - 2010 - Dissertation, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra
"Descartes' myth" and professor Ryle's fallacy.Dickinson S. Miller - 1951 - Journal of Philosophy 48 (April):270-279.
The Persistence of Category Mistakes in Psychology.Per Holth - 2001 - Behavior and Philosophy 29:203 - 219.
Professor Ryle's category-mistake.Albert Hofstadter - 1951 - Journal of Philosophy 48 (April):257-269.
Ryle’s Dispositional Analysis of Mind and its Relevance.Desh Raj Sirswal - 2010 - Review Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences (April, 2010):103-112.


Added to PP

1,833 (#4,467)

6 months
904 (#837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Desh Raj Sirswal
Panjab University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references