Episteme 1 (3):235-248 (2005)

Sergio Sismondo
Queen's University
The Science Wars have not involved any violence, nor even threats of violence. Thus the label “wars” for this series of discussions, mostly one-sided and mostly located within the academy, is something of an overblown metaphor. Nonetheless, I will suggest that there are some respects in which the metaphor is appropriate. The Science Wars involve territory, albeit a metaphorical kind of territory. They inspire work that can be best interpreted as ideological, a result of disciplinary interests. Moreover, fellow participants in the wars and others reward that ideological work.My goal in this is to display efforts to maintain a discipline's epistemic authority, the recognition that members of that discipline have legitimate claims to knowledge on a subject. The central section of the paper takes the form of a discussion of one recent contribution to the Science Wars, James Robert Brown's Who Rules in Science? My argument is at least somewhat generalizable beyond this book, and it therefore points to interesting phenomena related to epistemic authority
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2005
DOI 10.3366/epi.2004.1.3.235
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,077
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and Social Imagery.David Bloor - 1976 - University of Chicago Press.
The Fate of Knowledge.Helen E. Longino - 2001 - Princeton University Press.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
29 ( #357,960 of 2,411,498 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,366 of 2,411,498 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes