Episteme 1 (3):235-248 (2004)
The Science Wars have not involved any violence, nor even threats of violence. Thus the label “wars” for this series of discussions, mostly one-sided and mostly located within the academy, is something of an overblown metaphor. Nonetheless, I will suggest that there are some respects in which the metaphor is appropriate. The Science Wars involve territory, albeit a metaphorical kind of territory. They inspire work that can be best interpreted as ideological, a result of disciplinary interests. Moreover, fellow participants in the wars and others reward that ideological work.My goal in this is to display efforts to maintain a discipline's epistemic authority, the recognition that members of that discipline have legitimate claims to knowledge on a subject. The central section of the paper takes the form of a discussion of one recent contribution to the Science Wars, James Robert Brown's Who Rules in Science? My argument is at least somewhat generalizable beyond this book, and it therefore points to interesting phenomena related to epistemic authority
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking From Women's Lives.Sandra Harding - 1991 - Cornell University.
Laboratory Life; The Construction of Scientific Facts.Bruno Latour & Steven Woolgar - 1986 - Princeton University Press.
Laboratory Life. The Social Construction of Scientific Facts.Bruno Latour & Steve Woolgar - 1982 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 13 (1):166-170.
Citations of this work BETA
Boundaries, Reasons, and Ideology: Reply to Sismondo.James Robert Brown - 2004 - Episteme 1 (3):249-255.
Similar books and articles
Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk.Massimo Pigliucci - 2010 - University of Chicago Press.
Québec Studies in the Philosophy of Science Part 1: Logic, Mathematics, Physics and History of Science Part 2: Biology, Psychology, Cognitive Science and Economics Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vols. 177 and 178 Mathieu Marion and Robert S. Cohen, Editors Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1995–96, Vol. 1: Xi + 320 Pp., $180; Vol. 2: Xi +303 Pp., $154. [REVIEW]James Robert Brown - 1998 - Dialogue 37 (3):620.
Book Review:Science and Convention Jerzy Giedymin. [REVIEW]James Robert Brown - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (1):168-.
Who Rules in Science? An Opinionated Guide to the Wars.Robert G. Hudson - 2003 - Dialogue 42 (3):616-617.
Book Review The Science Wars. [REVIEW]James Robert Brown - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (3):523-525.
Critical Notice: Scientific Civilization and its Discontents: Further Reflections on the Science Wars.Keith Parsons - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (4):645-651.
Who Rules in Science? An Opinionated Guide to the Wars James Robert Brown Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001, Xi + 236 Pp., $26.00. [REVIEW]Robert G. Hudson - 2003 - Dialogue 42 (03):616-.
Who Rules in Science?: An Opinionated Guide to the Wars.James Robert Brown - 2001 - Harvard University Press.
Added to index2010-07-11
Total downloads17 ( #286,799 of 2,177,829 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #45,295 of 2,177,829 )
How can I increase my downloads?