Evidence based medicine guidelines: a solution to rationing or politics disguised as science?

Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):171-175 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“Evidence based medicine” is often seen as a scientific tool for quality improvement, even though its application requires the combination of scientific facts with value judgments and the costing of different treatments. How this is done depends on whether we approach the problem from the perspective of individual patients, doctors, or public health administrators. Evidence based medicine exerts a fundamental influence on certain key aspects of medical professionalism. Since, when clinical practice guidelines are created, costs affect the content of EBM, EBM inevitably becomes a form of rationing and adopts a public health point of view. This challenges traditional professionalism in much the same way as managed care has done in the US. Here we chart some of these major philosophical issues and show why simple solutions cannot be found. The profession needs to pay more attention to different uses of EBM in order to preserve the good aspects of professionalism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,517

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The challenges of evidence-based medicine: A philosophical perspective.Abhaya V. Kulkarni - 2005 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8 (2):255-260.
Evidence-based medicine and progress in the medical sciences.Leen De Vreese - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):852-856.
Whither our art? Clinical wisdom and evidence-based medicine.Malcolm Parker - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (3):273-280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
43 (#366,339)

6 months
11 (#350,234)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?