Why AI shall emerge in the one of possible worlds?

AI and Society 34 (2):365-371 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present some philosophical considerations about the supposed AI emergence in the future. However, the predicted timeline of this process is uncertain. To avoid any kind of speculations on the proposed analysis from a scientific point of view, a metaphysical approach is undertaken as a modal context of the discussion. I argue that modal claim about possible AI emergence at a certain point of time in the future is justified from a temporal perspective. Therefore, worldwide society must be prepared for possible AI emergence and the expected profound impact of such an event on the existential status of humanity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Open future and modal anti-realism.Daniel Kodaj - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (2):1-22.
Primitive worlds.Takashi Yagisawa - 2002 - Acta Analytica 17 (1):19-37.
Future and non-future modal sentences.Tom Werner - 2006 - Natural Language Semantics 14 (3):235-255.
Limits of Hybrid Modal Realism.Maciej Sendłak - 2015 - Axiomathes 25 (4):515-531.
Impossibilia.Martin Vacek - 2016 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 20 (1):81-97.
The Ontology of Many-Worlds : Modality and Time.Daisuke Kachi - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 13:42-46.
How properties emerge.Paul Humphreys - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (1):1-17.
Impossible Worlds.Mark Jago - 2013 - Noûs 47 (3):713-728.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-06

Downloads
90 (#183,310)

6 months
20 (#119,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ignacy Sitnicki
University of Warsaw

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations