History of the Human Sciences 24 (5):103-123 (2011)

Authors
Abstract
In his highly influential book (The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy, first published in 1958), Peter Winch introduces an alternative concept of interpretive social science, in which the focus is shifted from the actors’ subjective motives to the common elements found in every understandable action: language-games and rule-following. This Wittgensteinian, linguistic version of interpretive social science has had its vast array of critics throughout the years: according to some of them, it neglects the practical side of sociology; while others claim that it fails properly to answer the questions raised by the translation from one language-game to another, or that it renders critical social theory impossible. In my article, I try to reflect critically upon these critiques themselves, showing that the Winchian theory does not overlook the practice in understanding the different forms of life; that with slight modifications it is able to cope with the problem of translation, and that it does not aspire to be the critical theory that many of its critics would like it to be
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0952695111413842
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,676
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
Understanding a Primitive Society.Peter Winch - 1964 - American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (4):307 - 324.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Winch, Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory.Nigel Pleasants - 2000 - History of the Human Sciences 13 (1):78-91.
Winch’s Philosophical Bearings.Brian Fay - 2000 - History of the Human Sciences 13 (1):50-62.
Knowledge and Society.Arnold Levison - 1966 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 9 (1-4):132 – 146.
The Very Idea of a Social Science.A. R. Louch - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):273 – 286.
Winch’s Double-Edged Idea of a Social Science.Philip Pettit - 2000 - History of the Human Sciences 13 (1):63-77.
Iv. Understanding Peter Winch.W. W. Sharrock & R. J. Anderson - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):119 – 122.
Rethinking Social Criticism: Rules, Logic and Internal Critique.Stephen Kemp - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (4):61-84.
Can Social Science Be Just?John Gilbert Gunnell - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (4):595-621.
Book Review: On Interpretive Social Inquiry. [REVIEW]Theodore Schatzki - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (2):231-249.
Winch Reassessed.John G. Gunnell - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (4):616-622.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
35 ( #285,826 of 2,386,586 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #554,109 of 2,386,586 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes