Is the Method All Madness? Comments from a Participant-Observer Economist

Social Research: An International Quarterly 53 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nanoethics in a Nanolab: Ethics via Participation. [REVIEW]Julio R. Tuma - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):983-1005.
Sorting things out : the economist as an armchair observer.Harro Maas - 2011 - In Lorraine Daston & Elizabeth Lunbeck (eds.), Histories of Scientific Observation. University of Chicago Press. pp. 206--29.
Running it through the body.David Kirsh - 2012 - Proceedings of the 34th Annual Cognitive Science Society 34:593-598.
Practical Knowledge and Participant Observation.Julie Zahle - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (1):50 - 65.
Some comments on the 'ideal observer'.John-D. Bailiff - 1964 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24:423-428.
História da loucura de Michel Foucault como uma “história do outro”.Rafael Haddock-Lobo - 2008 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 53 (2):51-72.
Plato on Madness and Philosophy.Daniel Werner - 2011 - Ancient Philosophy 31 (1):47-71.
Madness and Method.Rodger Beehler - 1993 - Philosophy 68 (265):369 - 388.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-24

Downloads
9 (#1,224,450)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references