Kantian Disregard for Non-Rational Humans: Immanuel Kant’s Haunting Impact on Contemporary Bioethics

Stance 15:112-119 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I seek to emphasize Immanuel Kant’s lingering and unsavory impact on medical ethics by emphasizing Kantian ethics’ disregard for non- rational humans. We must be considerate when discussing individuals who have some form of dementia, conditions that irreversibly diminish the ability to use rational thought, sometimes to a degree of severity that hinders essential daily functions. I argue that to consider ourselves proponents of human equality we must treat humans with dementia as members of the kingdom of ends.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Kant on euthanasia and the duty to die: clearing the air.Michael Cholbi - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (8):607-610.
The role of vulnerability in Kantian ethics.Paul Formosa - 2013 - In Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers & Susan Dodds, Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. New York: Oup Usa. pp. 88-109.
What We Should Treat as an End in Itself.Richard Curtis Dean - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Kantian Respect for Minimally Rational Animals.James Rocha - 2015 - Social Theory and Practice 41 (2):309-327.
Understanding Kant's Ethics.Michael Cholbi - 2016 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
To Die or Not to Die: A Kantian Perspective on Euthanasia.Navin Sinha - 2021 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 39 (1):13-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-26

Downloads
842 (#31,230)

6 months
300 (#8,781)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references