Defense Intelligence Journal 16 (1):61-76 (2007)

Authors
Michael Skerker
United States Naval Academy
Abstract
This paper will address the moral implications of non-coercive interrogations in intelligence contexts. U.S. Army and CIA interrogation manuals define non-coercive interrogation as interrogation which avoids the use of physical pressure, relying instead on oral gambits. These methods, including some that involve deceit and emotional manipulation, would be mostly familiar to viewers of TV police dramas. As I see it, there are two questions that need be answered relevant to this subject. First, under what circumstances, if any, may a state agent use deception or manipulation in the course of his or her duties? Second, if there are classes of persons who, by their activities, lose a legitimate expectation for honest-dealing, how are state agents to proceed when the identity of such persons is unclear?
Keywords interrogation  torture  just war theory  military ethics  intelligence ethics  detainee rights  prisoner rights  due process  war on terror  international relations  war
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Rights of Irregular Combatants.Michael Skerker - 2007 - International Journal of Intelligence Ethics 16 (1).
An Ethics of Interrogation.Michael Skerker - 2010 - University of Chicago Press.
Some Unsettling Ethical Reflections on Interrogation.L. Perry David - 2010 - International Journal of Intelligence Ethics 1 (1).
A Utilitarian Argument Against Torture Interrogation of Terrorists.Jean Maria Arrigo - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):543-572.
Empathy and Interrogation.Mavis Biss - 2014 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (2):277-288.
Review. [REVIEW]David L. Perry - 2005 - Ethics and International Affairs (March).
Medical Ethics and the Interrogation of Guantanamo 063.Steven H. Miles - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (4):5 – 11.
Physician Facilitation of Torture and Coercive Interrogation.David B. Waisel - 2010 - In G. A. van Norman, S. Jackson, S. H. Rosenbaum & S. K. Palmer (eds.), Clinical Ethics in Anesthesiology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 280.
Review. [REVIEW]L. Perry David - 2006 - Philosophical Explorations. (October).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-06-22

Total views
61 ( #185,304 of 2,498,920 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #36,192 of 2,498,920 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes