Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (2):129-133 (2007)
AbstractThis paper outlines the current common law principles that protect people’s interests in their bodies, excised body parts and tissue without conferring the rights of full legal ownership. It does not include the recent statutory amendments in jurisdictions such as New South Wales and the United Kingdom. It argues that at common law, people do not own their own bodies or excised bodily material. People can authorise the removal of their bodily material and its use, either during life or after their death, for medical or scientific purposes. Researchers who acquire human bodies, body parts or tissue pursuant to such an authority have a right to possess and use them according to the authorisation they have been given, but their rights fall short of full ownership because they are limited in the way that they can use the material. The legal rights of researchers who develop intellectual property and biological products from excised human tissue can be adequately protected by existing common law principles without the need for a new legal principle that people own body parts and tissue removed from their bodies.
Similar books and articles
Regulating Human Body Parts and Products.Marie Fox & Jean McHale - 2000 - Health Care Analysis 8 (2):83-85.
My Body, My Body Parts, My Property?Deryck Beyleveld & Roger Brownsword - 2000 - Health Care Analysis 8 (2):87-99.
International Human Rights Law and the Protection of the Individual's Rights in the Age of Terrorism: The Case of the United Kingdom.Nghia Hoang - unknown
WTO Rights and Human Rights in the WTO Arbitration (WTO-Rechte Und Menschenrechte Im WTO-Schiedsverfahren).Andreas Westermeier - unknown
Is `Property' Necessary? On Owning the Human Body and its Parts.Alexandra George - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (1):15-42.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads