Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):305-325 (2007)

Authors
Anthony Skelton
University of Western Ontario
Abstract
Critical notice of Robert Audi's The Good in the Right in which doubts are raised about the epistemological and ethical doctrines it defends. It doubts that an appeal to Kant is a profitable way to defend Rossian normative intuitionism.
Keywords Intuitionism  Pluralism  Self-evidence  Moral Epistemology  Kantian Intuitionism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0045-5091
DOI 10.1353/cjp.2007.0019
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Principia Ethica.Evander Bradley McGilvary - 1904 - Philosophical Review 13 (3):351.
Ethics.William Frankena - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (1):74-74.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Surveying Philosophers About Philosophical Intuition.J. R. C. Kuntz & J. R. Kuntz - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (4):643-665.
Surveying Philosophers: A Response to Kuntz & Kuntz.Wesley Buckwalter - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (4):515-524.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Critical Notice.Robert Stalnaker - 1988 - Mind 97 (385):117-128.
Challenges to Audi's Ethical Intuitionism.Klemens Kappel - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):391-413.
The Good in the Right by Robert Audi.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):250-261.
Audi on Mental Images.Lilly-Marlene Russow - 1980 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (September):353-356.
Some Remarks on Robert Audi's the Good in the Right.Candace Vogler - forthcoming - In Mark Timmons (ed.), Rationality and the Good. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
380 ( #17,791 of 2,344,022 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #25,306 of 2,344,022 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes