Critical Notice of Robert Audi, The Good in the Right

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):305-325 (2007)
Anthony Skelton
University of Western Ontario
Critical notice of Robert Audi's The Good in the Right in which doubts are raised about the epistemological and ethical doctrines it defends. It doubts that an appeal to Kant is a profitable way to defend Rossian normative intuitionism.
Keywords Intuitionism  Pluralism  Self-evidence  Moral Epistemology  Kantian Intuitionism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/cjp.2007.0019
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Surveying Philosophers About Philosophical Intuition.J. R. Kuntz & J. R. C. Kuntz - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (4):643-665.
Surveying Philosophers: A Response to Kuntz & Kuntz.Wesley Buckwalter - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (4):515-524.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Critical Notice.Robert Stalnaker - 1988 - Mind 97 (385):117-128.
Audi on Mental Images.Lilly-Marlene Russow - 1980 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (September):353-356.
The Good in the Right by Robert Audi.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):250-261.
Challenges to Audi's Ethical Intuitionism.Klemens Kappel - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):391-413.
Some Remarks on Robert Audi's the Good in the Right.Candace Vogler - forthcoming - In Mark Timmons (ed.), Rationality and the Good. Oxford University Press.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
220 ( #23,690 of 2,293,852 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #13,852 of 2,293,852 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature