In Alexander Bagattini & Colin Macleod (eds.), The Nature of Children's Well-Being: Theory and Practice. Springer. pp. 85-103 (2014)
AbstractUtilitarianism is the view according to which the only basic requirement of morality is to maximize net aggregate welfare. This position has implications for the ethics of creating and rearing children. Most discussions of these implications focus either on the ethics of procreation and in particular on how many and whom it is right to create, or on whether utilitarianism permits the kind of partiality that child rearing requires. Despite its importance to creating and raising children, there are, by contrast, few sustained discussions of the implications of utilitarian views of welfare for the matter of what makes a child’s life go well. This paper attempts to remedy this deficiency. It has four sections. Section one discusses the purpose of a theory of welfare and its adequacy conditions. Section two evaluates what prominent utilitarian theories of welfare imply about what makes a child’s life go well. Section three provides a sketch of a view about what is prudentially valuable for children. Section four sums things up
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Children’s Agency, Children’s Welfare: A Dialogical Approach to Child Development, Policy and Practice.Carol van Nijnatten - 2010 - Policy Press.
Conflicts of Interest in the Privatization of Child Welfare.Martin G. Leever - 2003 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):55-60.
IV. The Production of Children as a Problem of Utilitarian Ethics.Hermann Vetter - 1969 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 12 (1-4):445-447.
Utilitarian Morality and the Personal Point of View.David O. Brink - 1986 - Journal of Philosophy 83 (8):417-438.
Ideal Utilitarianism: Rashdall and Moore.Anthony Skelton - 2011 - In Thomas Hurka (ed.), Underivative Duty: British Moral Philosophers From Sidgwick to Ewing. Oxford University Press. pp. 45-65.
Children’s Labor Market Involvement, Household Work, and Welfare: A Brazilian Case Study. [REVIEW]J. Lawrence French - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 92 (1):63-78.
Foster Children and ADHD: Anger, Violence, and Institutional Power. [REVIEW]Niranjan S. Karnik - 2000 - Journal of Medical Humanities 21 (4):199-214.
Same-Sex Marriage: Not a Threat to Marriage or Children.Timothy F. Murphy - 2011 - Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (3):288-304.
Utilitarianism, Contractualism and Demandingness.Alison Hills - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):225-242.
From Separability to Unweighted Sum: A Case for Utilitarianism. [REVIEW]Yew-Kwang Ng - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (4):299-312.
References found in this work
Citations of this work
On the Minimal Risk Threshold in Research With Children.Ariella Binik - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):3-12.
Is Children’s Wellbeing Different From Adults’ Wellbeing?Andrée-Anne Cormier & Mauro Rossi - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (8):1146-1168.
Children's Well-Being: A Philosophical Analysis.Anthony Skelton - 2015 - In Guy Fletcher (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-being. London. pp. 366-377.
Children and Well-Being.Anthony Skelton - 2018 - In Anca Gheaus, Gideon Calder & Jurgen De Wispelaere (eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Childhood and Children. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. pp. 90-100.