Rationalising circumcision: from tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom--critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation

Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):248-253 (2004)

Authors
Sirkku Hellsten
University of Helsinki
Abstract
Despite global and local attempts to end genital mutilation, in their various forms, whether of males or females, the practice has persisted throughout human history in most parts of the world. Various medical, scientific, hygienic, aesthetic, religious, and cultural reasons have been used to justify it. In this symposium on circumcision, against the background of the other articles by Hutson, Short, and Viens, the practice is set by the author within a wider, global context by discussing a range of rationalisations used to support different types of genital mutilation throughout time and across the globe. It is argued that in most cases the rationalisations invented to provide support for continuing the practice of genital mutilation—whether male or female—within various cultural and religious settings have very little to do with finding a critical and reflective moral justification for these practices. In order to question the ethical acceptability of the practice in its non-therapeutic forms, we need to focus on child rights protection
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2004.008888
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,736
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Are There Any Cultural Rights?Chandran Kukathas - 1992 - Political Theory 20 (1):105-139.
Male Circumcision: A Scientific Perspective.R. V. Short - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):241-241.
Female Genital Mutilation.Rida Usman Khalafzai - 2008 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 14 (1):1.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

In Defence of Genital Autonomy for Children.Brian D. Earp - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (3):158-163.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Female Genital Mutilation.Rida Usman Khalafzai - 2008 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 14 (1):1.
Modern Liberalism, Female Circumcision, and the Rationality of Traditions.Jeffrey P. Bishop - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (4):473 – 497.
Routine Neonatal Circumcision: Symbol of the Birth of the Therapeutic State.Thomas Szasz - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):137-148.
Public Health Ethics and Liberalism.Lubomira V. Radoilska - 2009 - Public Health Ethics 2 (2):135-145.
Public Space.James Mensch - 2007 - Continental Philosophy Review 40 (1):31-47.
Public Health and Public Goods.Jonny Anomaly - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):251-259.
Public Health and Human Rights.Rida Usman Khalafzai - 2009 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 14 (3):4.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
37 ( #216,572 of 2,243,790 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #624,610 of 2,243,790 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature