Journal of Global Ethics 5 (2):81-96 (2009)

Abstract
The argument of this article is that what I term generic globalization has created unprecedented opportunities for advances in human rights universally, but that the dominant actually existing historical form of globalization ? capitalist globalization ? undermines these opportunities. Substantively, I argue that taking the globalization of human rights seriously means eliminating the ideological distinction that exists between civil and political rights on the one hand, and economic and social rights on the other. Doing this systematically undermines the three central claims of capitalist globalization ? namely, that globalizing corporations are the most efficient and equitable form of production, distribution and exchange; that the transnational capitalist class organizes communities and the global order in the best interests of everyone; and that the culture-ideology of consumerism will satisfy our real needs
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/17449620903110235
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,172
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands.Michael Walzer - 1973 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (2):160-180.
Orientalism.Edward Said - 1979 - Vintage.
Cosmopolitan Respect and Patriotic Concern.Richard W. Miller - 1998 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (3):202-224.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-07-27

Total views
96 ( #123,063 of 2,517,876 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,482 of 2,517,876 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes