The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:51-57 (2001)
In this paper, I want to focus attention on ways in which the role of idealization in science has been rather neglected by standard methodology, and suggest that this distinct role for idealization is the truly important role it plays in science. Further, I suggest that there are a number of important cases in theoretical science where the issue of idealization is not the issue of misrepresentation in some sense. Rather, the question is which of several alternative idealizations correctly represents the fundamental causalstructure of the world, and which idealizations, consequently, are appropriate for the scientific account of the world that is correct in its basic notion of what is an appropriate explanatory format for dealing with the physical phenomena in question. My argument is that the issues of idealization are important for methodology not primarily for the reasons that have so far exercised most philosophers of science who have worried about idealization in science
|Keywords||Conference Proceedings Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Husserl, Galileo, and the Processes of Idealization.James W. Garrison - 1986 - Synthese 66 (2):329 - 338.
Idealization in Cassirer's Philosophy of Mathematics.Thomas Mormann - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):151 - 181.
Approximations, Idealizations, and Models in Statistical Mechanics.Chuang Liu - 2004 - Erkenntnis 60 (2):235-263.
Idealization and the Structure of Theories in Biololgy.Alfonso Arroyo-Santos & Xavier de Donato-Rodríguez - manuscript
The Structure of Idealization in Biological Theories: The Case of the Wright-Fisher Model.Donato Rodriguez Xavier & Arroyo-Santos Alfonso - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie.
Approximation and Idealization: Why the Difference Matters.John D. Norton - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (2):207-232.
Neopositivism, Marxism, and Idealization: Some Comments on Professor Nowak's Paper.Peter P. Kirschenmann - 1985 - Studies in East European Thought 30 (3):219-235.
Idealization and Factualization in Science.Władysław Krajewski - 1977 - Erkenntnis 11 (1):323 - 339.
Idealized Laws, Antirealism, and Applied Science: A Case in Hydrogeology.K. S. Shrader-Frechette - 1989 - Synthese 81 (3):329 - 352.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads23 ( #219,933 of 2,172,937 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #324,815 of 2,172,937 )
How can I increase my downloads?