David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:51-57 (2001)
In this paper, I want to focus attention on ways in which the role of idealization in science has been rather neglected by standard methodology, and suggest that this distinct role for idealization is the truly important role it plays in science. Further, I suggest that there are a number of important cases in theoretical science where the issue of idealization is not the issue of misrepresentation in some sense. Rather, the question is which of several alternative idealizations correctly represents the fundamental causalstructure of the world, and which idealizations, consequently, are appropriate for the scientific account of the world that is correct in its basic notion of what is an appropriate explanatory format for dealing with the physical phenomena in question. My argument is that the issues of idealization are important for methodology not primarily for the reasons that have so far exercised most philosophers of science who have worried about idealization in science
|Keywords||Conference Proceedings Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
James W. Garrison (1986). Husserl, Galileo, and the Processes of Idealization. Synthese 66 (2):329 - 338.
Thomas Mormann (2007). Idealization in Cassirer's Philosophy of Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):151 - 181.
Chuang Liu (2004). Approximations, Idealizations, and Models in Statistical Mechanics. Erkenntnis 60 (2):235-263.
Alfonso Arroyo-Santos & Xavier de Donato-Rodríguez, Idealization and the Structure of Theories in Biololgy.
Donato Rodriguez Xavier & Arroyo-Santos Alfonso (2012). The Structure of Idealization in Biological Theories: The Case of the Wright-Fisher Model. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie.
John D. Norton (2012). Approximation and Idealization: Why the Difference Matters. Philosophy of Science 79 (2):207-232.
Charles Wallis (1994). Representation and the Imperfect Ideal. Philosophy of Science 61 (3):407-28.
Chris Pincock (2007). Mathematical Idealization. Philosophy of Science 74 (5):957-967.
Katarzyna Paprzycka (2000). Idealization in Unitarian Metaphysics. Axiomathes 11 (1-3):7-19.
Peter P. Kirschenmann (1985). Neopositivism, Marxism, and Idealization: Some Comments on Professor Nowak's Paper. Studies in East European Thought 30 (3):219-235.
Władysław Krajewski (1977). Idealization and Factualization in Science. Erkenntnis 11 (1):323 - 339.
K. S. Shrader-Frechette (1989). Idealized Laws, Antirealism, and Applied Science: A Case in Hydrogeology. Synthese 81 (3):329 - 352.
Stephan Hartmann (1998). Idealization in Quantum Field Theory. In Niall Shanks (ed.), Idealization in Contemporary Physics. pp. 99-122.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads23 ( #205,585 of 1,924,699 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #96,479 of 1,924,699 )
How can I increase my downloads?