Blame, respect and recognition: A reply to Theo Van willigenburg

Utilitas 17 (3):333-347 (2005)

Authors
John Skorupski
University of St. Andrews
Abstract
In an article in Utilitas Theo van Willigenburg has argued that moral valuation is distinguished from other forms of valuation by the Kantian concept of respect. He criticizes, from that standpoint, an account I put forward, which builds on the connections between moral wrongdoing, blame and withdrawal of recognition. I examine the difference between these two approaches and defend my own.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0953820805001688
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,355
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Respect and Membership in the Moral Community.Carla Bagnoli - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (2):113 - 128.
What is Normativity?John Skorupski - 2007 - Disputatio 2 (23):1 - 23.
Welfare and Self-Governance.John Skorupski - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (3):289-309.
Moral Obligation, Blame, and Self-Governance.John Skorupski - 2010 - Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (2):158-180.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
96 ( #90,294 of 2,286,119 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #195,941 of 2,286,119 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature