Philosophers' Imprint 8 (10):1-14 (2008)
Local versions of the (special) principle of relativity say that if the same type of experiment is conducted in two isolated, unaccelerated laboratories, then the outcomes of those experiments must be the same. Global versions of the principle say that if you take a physically possible world and boost the entire material content of that world, you get another physically possible world. Some authors say that the local and the global principles are logically independent, and that the local version is more important. These authors are wrong. I argue that the global version entails the local version, and discuss why a counterexample to this entailment offered by Tim Budden fails
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Global Idealism/Local Materialism.Koichiro Matsuno & Stanley N. Salthe - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (3):309-337.
Global Bioethics: Utopia or Reality?Sirkku K. Hellsten - 2008 - Developing World Bioethics 8 (2):70-81.
The Position of Event-Related EEG Activity in the Local/Global Theory.V. Kolev & J. Yordanova - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):407-407.
Some Thoughts on Relativity and the Flow of Time: Einstein's Equations Given Absolute Simultaneity.J. Brian Pitts - unknown
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads62 ( #85,569 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,516 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?