Bradley’s Regress and Visual Content

Axiomathes:1-18 (forthcoming)
Authors
Błażej Skrzypulec
Polish Academy of Sciences
Abstract
According to the well-known Bradley’s Regress argument, one cannot explain the unity of states of affairs by referring to relations combining objects with properties. This argument has been widely discussed within analytic metaphysics, but has not been recognized as relevant for the philosophy of perception. I argue that the mainstream characterization of visual content is threatened by the Bradley’s Regress, and the most influential metaphysical solutions to the regress argument cannot be applied in the context of visual content. However, I show that a proper solution to Bradley’s Regress can be formulated by taking into consideration features of visual content suggested by empirical research in vision science.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10516-018-9399-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,086
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A World of States of Affairs.D. Armstrong - 1997 - Philosophy 74 (287):130-134.
Tensing the Copula.David Lewis - 2002 - Mind 111 (441):1-14.
Object Persistence in Philosophy and Psychology.Brian J. Scholl - 2007 - Mind and Language 22 (5):563–591.
Four Disputes About Properties.David M. Armstrong - 2005 - Synthese 144 (3):309-320.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bradley's Regress: A Matter of Parsimony.Michele Paolini Paoletti - 2018 - In Daniele Bertini & Damiano Migliorini (eds.), Relations. Ontology and Philosophy of Religion. Milan: Mimesis International. pp. 109-122.
Bradley’s Regress.Anna-Sofia Maurin - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (11):794-807.
Bradley’s Regress, Truthmaking, and Constitution.Howard Peacock - 2012 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 86 (1):1-21.
Ontology of Early Visual Content.Błażej Skrzypulec - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (2):261-276.
Do We Need Visual Subjects?Błażej Skrzypulec - 2018 - Philosophical Psychology 31 (4):574-594.
Regarding a Regress.Yuri Cath - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (3):358-388.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-27

Total views
2 ( #1,003,783 of 2,313,330 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #520,011 of 2,313,330 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature