Foundations of Physics 50 (11):1398-1410 (2020)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Eternalism is the view that all times are equally real. The relativity of simultaneity in special relativity backs this up. There is no cosmically extended, self-existing ‘now.’ This leads to a tricky problem. What makes statements about the present true? I shall approach the problem along the lines of perspectival realism and argue that the choice of the perspective does. To corroborate this point, the Lorentz transformations of special relativity are compared to the structurally similar equations of the Doppler effect. The ‘now’ is perspectivally real in the same way as a particular electromagnetic spectrum frequency. I also argue that the ontology of time licensed by perspectival realism is more credible in this context than its current alternative, the fragmentalist interpretation of special relativity.
|
Keywords | philosophy of time eternalism special relativity the now truthmaking perspectival realism fragmentalism |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10701-020-00385-x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy.Isaac Newton - 1999 - University of California Press.
View all 34 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Fine’s Fragmentalist Interpretation of Special Relativity.Thomas Hofweber & Marc Lange - 2017 - Noûs 51 (4):871-883.
String Theory, Loop Quantum Gravity and Eternalism.Baptiste Le Bihan - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10:17.
On the Fragmentalist Interpretation of Special Relativity.Martin A. Lipman - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (1):21-37.
Perspectival Truth and Perspectival Realism.Giuliano Torrengo - 2010 - In François Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftali Villanueva (eds.), Context-Dependence, Perspective and Relativity. Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 6--333.
Perspectival Realism and Norms of Scientific Representation.Quentin Ruyant - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (2):1-17.
Privileged-Perspective Realism in the Quantum Multiverse.Nora Berenstain - 2020 - In David Glick, George Darby & Anna Marmodoro (eds.), The Foundation of Reality: Fundamentality, Space, and Time. Oxford University Press.
Teleportative Observers Versus Special Relativity Observers: The Logical Universal Chronology and Presentism.James Goetz - manuscript
Tense, Perspectival Properties, and Special Relativity.Peter Ludlow - 2016 - Manuscrito 39 (4):49-74.
Relativity and Three Four‐Dimensionalisms.Cody Gilmore, Damiano Costa & Claudio Calosi - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (2):102-120.
The Grounding Problem for Eternalism.Thorben Petersen - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (7):1819-1852.
A Glimpse of Special Theory of Relativity.Arjun Dahal - 2017 - Journal of St. Xavier's Physics Council:5.
Relativity of Simultaneity and Eternalism: In Defense of Blockworld.Daniel Peterson & Michael Silberstein - 2007 - In Vesselin Petkov (ed.), Space, Time, and Spacetime: Physical and Philosophical Implications of Minkowski's Unification of Space and Time. Springer.
In Light of the Theory of Special Relativity is a Passage of Time and the Argument of the Presentist Untenable?Mekhi Dhesi - 2016 - Dissertation, University College London
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-09-21
Total views
118 ( #83,251 of 2,411,342 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
118 ( #4,792 of 2,411,342 )
2020-09-21
Total views
118 ( #83,251 of 2,411,342 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
118 ( #4,792 of 2,411,342 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads