The Monist 88 (3):362-369 (2005)
There is a tension between the “growing block” account of time (closed past, open future) and the possibility of backwards time travel. If Tim the time traveler can someday travel backwards through time, then he has (in a certain sense) already been. He might discover this fact before (in another sense) he goes. Hence a dilemma: it seems that either Tim’s future is determined in an odd way or cases of (temporary) ontic indeterminate identity are possible. Either Tim cannot avoid heading for the past or he is only indeterminately that guy who appeared in the past with many of Tim’s memories. Determinacy in the past implies a degree of determinism in the future; indeterminism about the future seeps back to the past
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy General Interest Philosophy of Mind Philosophy of Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Why There Cannot Be Any Such Thing as “Time Travel”.Rupert Read - 2012 - Philosophical Investigations 35 (2):138-153.
Honors 229F The Problem of Time: Puzzles About Time in Philosophy, Literature, and Film TuTh 11-12:15.Tydings Hall - unknown
Why Would Time Travelers Try to Kill Their Younger Selves?Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2005 - The Monist 88 (3):388-395.
Time Travel and Time Machines.Douglas Kutach - 2013 - In Adrian Bardon & Heather Dyke (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Blackwell.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads136 ( #35,207 of 2,172,658 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #30,828 of 2,172,658 )
How can I increase my downloads?