Sensationalism versus news of the moral life: Making the distinction

Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (1):5 – 15 (1994)
This study argues that there is a moral dimension to sensational news. The study assumes that citizens have a moral interest in the community because moral standards play a role in governing social behavior. Some news, labeled as sensational, reflects news of the moral life of the community and is related to the community's moral well-being. This study addresses the problem of making the distinction between such news and news that is sensational for its own sake. This study also suggests a method that journalists can use to responsibly cover stories traditionally associated with press sensationalism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1207/s15327728jmme0901_1
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,781
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Virtuous Journalist.Stephen Klaidman - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
The 'Golden Mean' in Journalism.Sandra H. Dickson - 1988 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 3 (1):33 – 37.
Suicide Coverage in Newspapers: An Ethical Consideration.Elizabeth B. Ziesenis - 1991 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 6 (4):234 – 244.
Grounding an Ethics of Journalism.John P. Ferré - 1988 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 3 (1):18-27.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
33 ( #161,273 of 2,199,704 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #300,206 of 2,199,704 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature