Should philosophy of science be rated X too?
Abstract
Proceedings of the Sixth International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference (IHPST), Denver, Colorado, November 7-10, 2001; and Australasian Association of History, Philosophy & Social Studies of Science (AAHPSSS), Melbourne University, June 25-28, 2001 (PDF).Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Consensus and Evolution in Science.Gonzalo Munevar - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:120 - 129.
The relevance of cognitive science to teaching.Peter Slezak - 2007 - Journal of Cognitive Science 8 (2):171-205.
The 'New' History of Science: Implications for Philosophy of Science.Rachel Laudan - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:476 - 481.
Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science.Michael R. Matthews - 1994 - Routledge.
Is the History of Science Relevant to the Philosophy of Science?Marga Vicedo - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:490 - 496.
Philosophy of Science, History of Science, and Science Education.Robert Palter - 1974 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974:313 - 321.
Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk.Massimo Pigliucci - 2010 - University of Chicago Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
26 (#449,757)
6 months
0
2009-01-28
Downloads
26 (#449,757)
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
