Should philosophy of science be rated X too?

Abstract

Proceedings of the Sixth International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference (IHPST), Denver, Colorado, November 7-10, 2001; and Australasian Association of History, Philosophy & Social Studies of Science (AAHPSSS), Melbourne University, June 25-28, 2001 (PDF).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,442

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Consensus and Evolution in Science.Gonzalo Munevar - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:120 - 129.
The relevance of cognitive science to teaching.Peter Slezak - 2007 - Journal of Cognitive Science 8 (2):171-205.
The 'New' History of Science: Implications for Philosophy of Science.Rachel Laudan - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:476 - 481.
Is the History of Science Relevant to the Philosophy of Science?Marga Vicedo - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:490 - 496.
Philosophy of Science, History of Science, and Science Education.Robert Palter - 1974 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974:313 - 321.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
26 (#449,757)

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Slezak
University of New South Wales

Citations of this work

Going Public: A Cautionary Tale.Michael Lynch - 2009 - Spontaneous Generations 3 (1):213-219.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references