Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):207-222 (2007)

This paper aims to offer an analysis of `Against Hobbes ', the title of the second section of Kant's essay On the Common Saying: That May be Correct in Theory but is of no Use in Practice. The paper suggests that we should take the title `Against Hobbes ' seriously and that Kant meant to target Hobbes as the standard-bearer of the old regime and in particular Hobbes 's claim that the Head of state cannot act unjustly against his citizens. It is argued that Kant's interpretation of Hobbes conforms to what can be regarded as the majority view in Hobbesian scholarship and that Kant poses a serious challenge to Hobbes, in so far as he removes the very foundations from Hobbes 's argument on justice, namely, a specific notion of natural law. Finally the paper highlights Kant's lack of interest in engaging with possible Hobbesian counter-arguments. Key Words: civil law • justice • morality • natural law
Keywords morality   justice   civil law   natural law
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1740468107079259
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,195
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Liberal Slip of Thomas Hobbes's Authoritarian Pen.Gabriella Slomp - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (2-3):357-369.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
43 ( #248,393 of 2,448,333 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #450,727 of 2,448,333 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes