`Ought' and `better'

Mind 79 (315):385-394 (1970)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/LXXIX.315.385
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Oughts and Ends.Stephen Finlay - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (3):315 - 340.
Epistemic and Deontic Should.Fabrizio Cariani - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):73-84.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Reviews. [REVIEW]Aaron Sloman - 1970 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21 (2):249-253.
How to Dispose of the Free Will Issue.Aaron Sloman - 1993 - AISB Quarterlye 82:31-2.
Damasio's Error.Aaron Sloman - 2004 - The Philosophers' Magazine 28 (28):61-64.
Colour Incompatibilities and Analyticity.Aaron Sloman - 1964 - Analysis 24 (Suppl-2):104 - 119.
Transformations of Illocutionary Acts.Aaron Sloman - 1969 - Analysis 30 (2):56 - 59.
How to Derive "Better" From "Is".Aaron Sloman - 1969 - American Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1):43 - 52.
'Necessary', 'A Priori' and 'Analytic'.Aaron Sloman - 1965 - Analysis 26 (1):12 - 16.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
250 ( #15,629 of 2,210,098 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #380,829 of 2,210,098 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature