Confusion and dependence in uses of history

Synthese 184 (3):261-286 (2012)
Many people argue that history makes a special difference to the subjects of biology and psychology, and that history does not make this special difference to other parts of the world. This paper will show that historical properties make no more or less of a difference to biology or psychology than to chemistry, physics, or other sciences. Although historical properties indeed make a certain kind of difference to biology and psychology, this paper will show that historical properties make the same kind of difference to geology, sociology, astronomy, and other sciences. Similarly, many people argue that nonhistorical properties make a special difference to the nonbiological and the nonpsychological world. This paper will show that nonhistorical properties make the same difference to all things in the world when it comes to their causal behavior and that historical properties make the same difference to all things in the world when it comes to their distributions. Although history is special, it is special in the same way to all parts of the world
Keywords natural kinds  historical kinds  eternal kinds  biological explanations  psychological explanations  essential properties  historical properties  Ruth Millikan  Berent Enc  Crawford Elder
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-010-9785-4
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Study of Instinct.N. Tinbergen - 1954 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5 (17):72-76.
In Defense of Proper Functions.Ruth G. Millikan - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302.
Functional Analysis.Robert C. Cummins - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (November):741-64.

View all 47 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Millikan's Historical Kinds.Mohan Matthen - 2013 - In Dan Ryder, Justine Kingsbury & Kenneth Williford (eds.), Millikan and Her Critics. Wiley. pp. 135-154.
When Functions and Causes Compete.Daniel Heussen - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 16 (3):233-250.
Historical Kinds and the "Special Sciences".Ruth G. Millikan - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 95 (1-2):45-65.
Conventionalism and the World as Bare Sense-Data.Crawford L. Elder - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):261 – 275.
"Realism and the Problem of" Infimae Species".Crawford Elder - 2007 - American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):111 - 127.
Diseases as Natural Kinds.Stefan Dragulinescu - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (5):347-369.
Biological Species Are Natural Kinds.Crawford L. Elder - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):339-362.
A Unificationist Vindication of Moral Explanation.Lei Zhong - 2011 - Philosophical Forum 42 (2):131-146.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

474 ( #3,696 of 2,153,584 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

29 ( #11,466 of 2,153,584 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums