Practical Knowledge and the Structure of Action

In Günter Abel & James Conant (eds.), Rethinking Epistemology, Volume 2. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. pp. 133-227 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I argue that there is a cognition condition on intention and intentional action. If an agent is doing A intentionally, she has knowledge in intention that he is doing A. If an agent intends to do A, she has knowledge in intention that she is going to do A. In both cases, the agent has knowledge of eventual success, in this sense: she knows that it will be no accident if she ends up having done A. In both cases, the agent’s knowledge is of what is happening, or what is going to happen, in the world; it is not knowledge merely of her state of mind. This knowledge is practical: it the cause of what it understands; without it what is happening, or what is going to happen, is not an intentional action, and any practical thought of the agent’s about what is happening, or what is going to happen, does not hit the heights of intention. I demonstrate that famous examples (from Davidson and Bratman) purporting to show that the cognition condition should be rejected (or its content or scope weakened) are ineffective, because they trade on confusions about the different kinds of failure to which intentional action may be susceptible, confusions remedied via reflection on the structure of intentional action. I show that the cognition condition is grounded not in reflection about the directions of fit and guidance of different kinds of mental states, nor in the indicative content of linguistic expressions of intention, but in the calculative and temporal structure of intentional action itself.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knowledge, Practical Reasoning and Action.Peter Baumann - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (1):7-26.
Handlungen, Absichten und praktisches Wissen.David Horst - 2013 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 61 (3):373-386.
‘Our’ Practical Knowledge.Yukio Irie - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 33:21-26.
Warrant and action.Mikkel Gerken - 2011 - Synthese 178 (3):529-547.
Anscombe and Practical Knowledge of What Is Happening.Thor Grünbaum - 2009 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 78 (1):41-67.
Practical knowledge and acting together.Blomberg Olle - 2018 - In J. Adam Carter, Andy Clark, Jesper Kallestrup, Orestis Palermos & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Socially Extended Knowledge. Oxford University Press. pp. 87-111.
Anscombe on 'Practical Knowledge'.Richard Moran - 2004 - In J. Hyman & H. Steward (eds.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge University Press. pp. 43-68.
Knowledge in Action.Jonathan Weisberg - 2013 - Philosophers' Imprint 13.
Understanding 'Practical Knowledge'.John Schwenkler - 2015 - Philosophers' Imprint 15.
Practical Knowledge and Fallibility – Some Pitfalls.Ulrike Mürbe - 2014 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 28 (1):13-29.
Anscombe on Practical Knowledge.Kieran Setiya - 2016 - In Practical Knowledge: Selected Essays. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
Technology, Humanism and Practical Philosophy.Franco Volpi - 2013 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 5 (2):176-188.


Added to PP

139 (#134,216)

6 months
29 (#108,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Will Small
University of Illinois, Chicago

Citations of this work

Basic Action and Practical Knowledge.Will Small - 2019 - Philosophers' Imprint 19.
Ryle on the Explanatory Role of Knowledge How.Will Small - 2017 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 5 (5).
Modeling practical thinking.Matthew Mosdell - 2018 - Mind and Language 34 (4):445-464.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references