The compatibility of direct realism with the scientific account of perception; comment on mark Crooks

Journal of Mind and Behavior 23 (3):239-244 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

These comments are concerned to show that direct realism about perception is quite compatible with the physical and neuroscientific story. Use is made of D.M. Armstrong's account of perception as coming to believe by means of the senses. What we come to believe about is the bird on the gatepost, say. So the account is direct realist. But it is obviously compatible with the scientific story which explains how the coming to believe comes about. We can also identify beliefs with brain states

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are there mental inferences in direct perceptions?Dan D. Crawford - 1982 - American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (1):83-92.
Skepticism and the Veil of Perception.Michael Huemer (ed.) - 2001 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Perceiving empirical objects directly.Robert G. Hudson - 2000 - Erkenntnis 52 (3):357-371.
An empirical refutation of the direct realist theory of perception.J. R. Smythies & Vilayanur S. Ramachandran - 1997 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):437-438.
Arguments against direct realism and how to counter them.Pierre le Morvan - 2004 - American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (3):221-234.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
3 (#1,686,544)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jack Smart
Last affiliation: Monash University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references