Are Natural and Unnatural Appetites Equally Controllable? A Response to Jensen's “Is Continence Enough?”

Christian Bioethics 10 (2-3):177-188 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This response challenges Jensen's analysis in no substantial way. Rather, it explains more fully some of the moral character categories that Aristotle provides. It argues that Aristotle understood there to be two forms of continence: the continence that enables us to control natural appetites and “some form” of continence directed towards unnatural appetites, generally engendered by some pathology or abuse.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,191

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
74 (#317,357)

6 months
8 (#632,505)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jane Smith
Ohio University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Nicomachean Ethics.Terence Irwin & Aristotle of Stagira - 1999 - Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Is Continence Enough?Steven Jensen - 2004 - Christian Bioethics 10 (2-3):161-176.

Add more references