Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):22 – 43 (1990)
The standard view of philosophers is that the existence of particular events within our universe is capable of being explained in terms of initial conditions and natural laws, but that the existence of our universe itself is a 'brute given' that is incapable of naturalistic explanation. A supernatural explanation of the existence of our universe may be alleged to be possible ('God created our universe so that humans may exist and the existence of humans is an intrinsic good'), but an explanation that appeals only to factors, situations or regularities in nature is deemed to be in principle impossible. It is also a standard view of philosophers that the less fundamental natural laws of our universe are capable of being explained in terms of more fundamental laws of our universe, but that the most basic natural laws of our universe are incapable of being explained naturalistically. Perhaps they can be explained supernaturally, by asserting that God ordained them so that humans may eventually evolve, but no other explanation is supposed possible
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Probabilistic Arguments for Multiple Universes.Paul Draper, Kai Draper & Joel Pust - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):288–307.
Anthropic Explanations in Cosmology.Quentin Smith - 1994 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (3):371 – 382.
Big Historical Foundations for Deep Future Speculations: Cosmic Evolution, Atechnogenesis, and Technocultural Civilization.Cadell Last - 2017 - Foundations of Science 22 (1):39-124.
Internal and External Causal Explanations of the Universe.Quentin Smith - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 79 (3):283 - 310.
Similar books and articles
Prior Probabilities in the Argument From Fine-Tuning.Richard Swinburne - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (5):641 - 653.
Evil, Fine-Tuning and the Creation of the Universe.Dan Dennis - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (2):139-145.
"How Does It Work" Versus "What Are the Laws?": Two Conceptions of Psychological Explanation.Robert C. Cummins - 2000 - In F. Keil & Robert A. Wilson (eds.), Explanation and Cognition, 117-145. MIT Press.
The Divine Lawmaker: Lectures on Induction, Laws of Nature, and the Existence of God.John Foster - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #147,949 of 2,154,175 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #224,605 of 2,154,175 )
How can I increase my downloads?