An overview of methods and empirical comparison of aggregate data and individual patient data results for investigating heterogeneity in meta‐analysis of time‐to‐event outcomes

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (5):468-478 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Meta-Analysis, Mega-Analysis, and Task Analysis in fMRI Research.Sergi G. Costafreda - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (4):275-277.
The chronic disease data bank: First principles to future directions.James F. Fries - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (2):161-180.
The limits of empirical studies on research ethics.Laurence R. Tancredi - 1995 - Ethics and Behavior 5 (3):217 – 236.
Meta‐analyses using individual patient data.Michael J. Clarke & Lesley A. Stewart - 1997 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 3 (3):207-212.
Algorithmic randomness in empirical data.James W. McAllister - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (3):633-646.
Mental models in data interpretation.Clark A. Chinn & William F. Brewer - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):219.
On nonparametric predictive inference and objective bayesianism.F. P. A. Coolen - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (1-2):21-47.
Empirical data sets are algorithmically compressible: Reply to McAllister.Charles Twardy, Steve Gardner & David L. Dowe - 2005 - Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 36 (2):391-402.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
40 (#389,966)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?