Foundations of Physics 17 (2):149-171 (1987)

Abstract
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox and the correlated states it introduced comprise one of the central interpretive problems of quantum mechanics. Because of the apparent nonlocal character of this paradox, it should be given a relativistic treatment. The purpose of this paper is to provide such a treatment
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00733205
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,518
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Re-Examined.David H. Sharp - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):225-233.
The Physics of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.B. H. Kellett - 1977 - Foundations of Physics 7 (9-10):735-757.
Separable Hidden Variables Theory to Explain Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.S. V. Bhave - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):467-475.
Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and Shannon.Asher Peres - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (3):511-514.
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.Bas C. Fraassen - 1974 - Synthese 29 (1-4):291 - 309.
The Vacuum in Relativistic Quantum Field Theory.Michael Redhead - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:77 - 87.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
78 ( #130,292 of 2,421,914 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #352,488 of 2,421,914 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes