Scientia et Fides 9 (2):35-53 (2021)

Abstract
Empirical science, such as psychology and neuroscience, employ diverse methods to develop data driven models and explanations for complex phenomena. In research on the self, differences in these methods produce different depictions of persons. Research in developmental psychology highlights the role of intuitive beliefs, such as psychological essentialism and intuitive dualism, in individuals’ singular, cohesive, and stable sense of self. On the other hand, research in neuroscience highlights the de-centralized, distributed, multitudes of neural networks in competition making selves, with arguments around whether the interpretation of these data imply that the self is somehow fundamental and special to human functioning. In this paper, I explore these discrepant pictures of the self to advance understanding about personhood. Specifically, I suggest that these divergent pictures of self from psychology and neuroscience have the potential to inform philosophical and theological discussions around personhood by anchoring models of persons in empirical views of persons. Likewise, I explore the opportunity for philosophy and theology to inform and enhance scientific research on the self by critiquing scientific bias and construct development as well as highlighting potential limits in understanding selves with empirical models.
Keywords identity  intuitive dualism  neuroscience  philosophy  psychological essentialism  self
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.12775/setf.2021.017
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,229
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can Intuitive Psychology Survive the Growth of Neuroscience?Keith Campbell - 1986 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 29 (June):143-152.
Me, My (Moral) Self, and I.Jim A. C. Everett, Joshua August Skorburg & Jordan Livingston - forthcoming - In Felipe De Brigard & Walter Sinnott Armstrong (eds.), Neuroscience and Philosophy. pp. 111-138.
The Syllogism of Neuro-Economics.Camillo Padoa-Schioppa - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):449-457.
Mind in Perspective: Psychology or Neuroscience?Marie-Helene Remy - 1990 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-09-24

Total views
1 ( #1,509,141 of 2,455,421 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,421 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes