In Otavio Bueno & Ali Abasnezhad (eds.), On the Sorites Paradox. Springer (forthcoming)
AbstractA requirement on any theory of vagueness is that it solve the sorites paradox. It is generally agreed that there are two aspects to such a solution: one task is to locate the error in the sorites argument; the second task is to explain why the sorites reasoning is a paradox rather than a simple mistake. I argue for a further constraint on approaches to the second task: they should conform to the standard modus operandi in formal semantics, in which the semantic theory one develops is taken to be implicit in the ordinary usage of competent speakers. Thus it should not turn out that one's explanation of why ordinary speakers react to the sorites reasoning in the way they do depends on speakers NOT thinking that the semantics of vague language is governed by the theory one is advocating. I then argue that, out of the current main contenders for a theory of vagueness, only theories that posit degrees of truth can meet this further constraint.
Similar books and articles
Remarks on the Current Status of the Sorites Paradox.Richard Dewitt - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17 (1):93.
A note on the sorites paradox.Graham Priest - 1979 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):74 – 75.
Strict Finitism and the Happy Sorites.Ofra Magidor - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):471-491.
A cognitive neuroscience, dual-systems approach to the sorites paradox.Leib Litman & Mark Zelcer - 2013 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 25 (3):355-366.
Towards an Unhappy-Face Solution to the Sorites Paradox.Margaret Ann Cuonzo - 1999 - Dissertation, City University of New York
Chrysippus and the epistemic theory of vagueness.Susanne Bobzien - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (1):217-238.
Vagueness: An Investigation Into Natural Languages and the Sorites Paradox.Linda Claire Burns - 1991 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tenenbaum and Raffman on Vague Projects, the Self-Torturer, and the Sorites.Luke Elson - 2016 - Ethics 126 (2):474-488.
Conjunction-based sorites: A misguided objection to degree-theoretic (fuzzy) solutions to sorites paradoxes. [REVIEW]Merrie Bergmann - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (1):1 - 4.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
These degrees go to eleven: fuzzy logics and gradable predicates.Petr Cintula, Berta Grimau, Carles Noguera & Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2022 - Synthese 200 (6):1-38.
A logical framework for graded predicates.Petr Cintula, Carles Noguera & Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2017 - In Alexandru Baltag, Jeremy Seligman & Tomoyuki Yamada (eds.), Logic, Rationality, and Interaction: LORI 2017. Berlin: Springer. pp. 3-16.
References found in this work
No references found.