In approaching Ch. 4 of Saving Truth from Paradox, it might be helpful first to revisit Curry’s original paper, and to revisit Lukasiewicz too, to provide more of the scenesetting that Field doesn’t himself fill in. So in §1 I’ll say something about Curry, in §2 we’ll look at what Lukasiewicz was up to in his original three-valued logic, and in §3 we’ll look at the move from a three-valued to a many-valued Lukasiewicz logic. In §4, I move on to announce a theorem by H´.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Curry's Paradox and 3-Valued Logic.A. N. Prior - 1955 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 33 (3):177 – 182.
An Elementary Proof of Chang's Completeness Theorem for the Infinite-Valued Calculus of Lukasiewicz.Roberto Cignoli & Daniele Mundici - 1997 - Studia Logica 58 (1):79-97.
The Liar Paradox and Fuzzy Logic.Petr Hájek, Jeff Paris & John Shepherdson - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (1):339-346.
Natural Deduction and Curry's Paradox.Susan Rogerson - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (2):155 - 179.
Rational Pavelka Predicate Logic is a Conservative Extension of Łukasiewicz Predicate Logic.Petr Hájek, Jeff Paris & John Shepherdson - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):669-682.
Lukasiewicz's Many-Valued Logic and Neoplatonic Scalar Modality.John N. Martin - 2002 - History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (2):95-120.
Degrees of Maximality of Łukasiewicz-Like Sentential Calculi.Grzegorz Malinowski - 1977 - Studia Logica 36 (3):213 - 228.
Added to index2010-05-22
Total downloads64 ( #80,858 of 2,158,357 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #87,143 of 2,158,357 )
How can I increase my downloads?