Determinism and prepunishment: The radical nature of compatibilism

Analysis 67 (296):347–349 (2007)
I shall argue that compatibilism cannot resist in a principled way the temptation to prepunish people. Compatibilism thus emerges as a much more radical view than it is typically presented and perceived, and is seen to be at odds with fundamental moral intuitions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2007.00706.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,613
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Time to Punish.Saul Smilansky - 1994 - Analysis 54 (1):50 - 53.
Time and Punishment.Christopher New - 1992 - Analysis 52 (1):35 - 40.
Punishing Times: Reply to Smilansky.Christopher New - 1995 - Analysis 55 (1):60 - 62.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

77 ( #68,001 of 2,168,938 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #346,364 of 2,168,938 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums