Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):428-429 (2001)
AbstractThe rhetoric of hypothesis testing implies that game theory is not testable if a negative result is blamed on any auxiliary hypothesis such as “rewards are inadequate.” This is because either the theory is not falsifiable (since a larger payoff can be imagined, one can always conclude that payoffs were inadequate) or it has no predictive content (the appropriate payoff cannot be prespecified).
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Editorial: Psychology and Experimental Philosophy.Joshua Knobe, Tania Lombrozo & Edouard Machery - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2):157-160.
Some Methodological Issues in Experimental Economics.Deborah Mayo - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):633-645.
The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics.Harold Kincaid & Don Ross (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Methodological Issues in Experimental Design and Interpretation.Francesco Guala - 2009 - In Harold Kincaid & Don Ross (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics. Oxford University Press. pp. 280--281.
Theory-Testing Experiments in the Economics Laboratory.Anthony S. Gillies & Mary Rigdon - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):410-411.
The Game-Theoretic Innocence of Experimental Behavioral Psychology.Don Ross - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):426-427.
Rationality in Economics: Constructivist and Ecological Forms.Vernon L. Smith - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Typological Thinking, Statistical Significance, and the Methodological Divergence of Experimental Psychology and Economics.Charles F. Blaich & Humberto Barreto - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):405-405.
Doing It Both Ways – Experimental Practice and Heuristic Context.Glenn W. Harrison & E. Elisabet Rutström - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):413-414.