Journal of Business Ethics 166 (2):271-292 (2020)

Andrew Smith
University of Arizona
The modern slavery literature engages with history in an extremely limited fashion. Our paper demonstrates to the utility of historical research to modern slavery researchers by explaining the rise and fall of the ethics-driven market category of “free-grown sugar” in nineteenth-century Britain. In the first decades of the century, the market category of “free-grown sugar” enabled consumers who were opposed to slavery to pay a premium for a more ethical product. After circa 1840, this market category disappeared, even though considerable quantities of slave-grown sugar continued to arrive into the UK. We explain the disappearance of the market category. Our paper contributes to the on-going debates about slavery in management by historicizing and thus problematizing the concept of “slavery”. The paper challenges those modern slavery scholars who argue that lack of consumer knowledge about product provenance is the main barrier to the elimination of slavery from today’s international supply chains. The historical research presented in this paper suggests that consumer indifference, rather than simply ignorance, may be the more fundamental problem. The paper challenges the optimistic historical metanarrative that pervades much of the research on ethical consumption. It highlights the fragility of ethics-driven market categories, offering lessons for researchers and practitioners seeking to tackle modern slavery.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04318-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,268
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Motivations of the Ethical Consumer.Oliver M. Freestone & Peter J. McGoldrick - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 79 (4):445-467.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hegel on Slavery and Domination.Steven B. Smith - 1992 - Review of Metaphysics 46 (1):97 - 124.
Modern Day Slavery in the United Arab Emirates.Barbara Degorge - 2006 - The European Legacy 11 (6):657-666.
Hutcheson and the "Classical" Theory of Slavery.Wylie Sypher - 1939 - Journal of Negro History 24 (3):263-280.
Combating Modern Slavery: What Can Business Do?Robin T. Byerly - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:124-130.
The Possibility of Contractual Slavery.Danny Frederick - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (262):47-64.
British Romantic Poets and the African Plight.Nataša Bakić-Mirić - 2008 - The European Legacy 13 (7):825-836.
La “nueva” esclavitud.Thomas Casadei - 2009 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 43:167 - 194.


Added to PP index

Total views
11 ( #823,144 of 62,241 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #232,632 of 62,241 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes