Ingarden vs. Meinong on the logic of fiction

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (1/2):93-105 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX


For Meinong, familiarly, fictional entities are not created, but rather merely discovered (or picked out) from the inexhaustible realm of Aussersein (beyond being and non-being). The phenomenologist Roman Ingarden, in contrast, offers in his Literary Work of Art of 1931 a constructive ontology of fiction, which views fictional objects as entities which are created by the acts of an author (as laws, for example, are created by acts of parliament). We outline the logic of fiction which is implied by Ingarden’s approach, showing how it distinguishes the properties possessed by fictional objects (for instance of having been created by such and such an author in such and such a work) from characteristics (for instance of smoking a pipe, of living in Baker Street) which are merely associated with such objects.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

764 (#13,836)

6 months
65 (#28,289)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Barry Smith
State University of New York, Buffalo

Citations of this work

Nonexistent objects.Maria Reicher - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Fictional Entities.Fiora Salis - 2013 - Online Companion to Problems in Analytic Philosophy.
Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and Properties.Hicham Jakha - forthcoming - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics:1-21.
More Things in Heaven and Earth.Barry Smith - 1995 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 50 (1):187-201.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references