Erkenntnis 24 (2):105 - 114 (1986)

The claim that nature is self-consistent has recently been contested by a number of paraconsistent logicians. In this paper I will survey the arguments which paraconsistent logicians have presented for the thesis that nature is actually inconsistent. My conclusion is that these arguments all fail.The paraconsistency programme has to date been concerned primarily with outlining the philosophical inadequacy of classical logic, and detailed discussions of issues bearing upon the philosophical adequacy of the paraconsistency position itself are not to be found as yet in the literature. This inadequacy will be illustrated here with respect to the question of the self-consistency of nature.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00167517
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,903
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Logic of Paradox.Graham Priest - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):219 - 241.
Exploring Meinong's Jungle and Beyond.Richard Routley - 1983 - Journal of Philosophy 80 (3):173-179.
Exploring Meinong's Jungle and Beyond.Richard Routley - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (4):539-552.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
27 ( #384,501 of 2,409,419 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #347,462 of 2,409,419 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes