Mental states via possessive predication: the grammar of possessive experiencer complex predicates in Persian

Natural Language Semantics:1-44 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Persian possesses a number of stative complex predicates with _dâshtan_ ‘to have’ that express certain kinds of mental state. I propose that these _possessive experiencer complex predicates_ be given a formal semantic treatment involving possession of a portion of an abstract quality by an individual, as in the analysis of property concept lexemes due to Francez and Koontz-Garboden (Language 91(3):533–563, 2015 ; Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34:93–106, 2016 ; Semantics and morphosyntactic variation: Qualities and the grammar of property concepts, Oxford University Press, 2017 ). Augmented with an analysis of prepositional phrases introducing the target of the mental state and an approach to gradability in terms of measure functions (Wellwood in Measuring predicates, PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, 2014 ), the analysis explains various properties of possessive experiencer complex predicates, including the behavior of target phrases, the ability of the non-verbal element to be modified by a range of adjectives, the direct participation of the non-verbal element in comparative constructions, and the ability of degree expressions to modify both the non-verbal element and the VP containing the complex predicate. Theoretically, the analysis ties transitive mental state expressions to the grammar and semantics of property concept sentences, which are expressed via possessive morphosyntax cross-linguistically, and connects with syntactic proposals that independently argue for a universal underlyingly possessive morphosyntax for mental state predicates (Noonan in Case and syntactic geometry, PhD dissertation, McGill University, 1992 ; Hale and Keyser in Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure, MIT Press, 2002 ). The work here also motivates modifications to Francez and Koontz-Garboden’s original proposal, and opens new questions in the original empirical domain of the analysis of possessive predicating strategies for the expression of property concept sentences.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Love's Possessiveness.Ryan Stringer - 2022 - Philosophy International Journal 5 (2):000252.
Possessed properties in Ulwa.Andrew Koontz-Garboden & Itamar Francez - 2010 - Natural Language Semantics 18 (2):197-240.
Temporal Adjectives and the Structure of Possessive DPs.Richard Larson & Sungeun Cho - 2003 - Natural Language Semantics 11 (3):217-247.
Possessive Power.Janet Farrell Smith - 1986 - Hypatia 1 (2):103 - 120.
Knowing Other Minds: A Scorekeeping Model.Patrizio Lo Presti - 2023 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 14 (4):1279-1308.
Philosophy and Logic of Predication.Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.) - 2016 - Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
In Defense of Theory.Ray Jackendoff - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (S2):185-212.
Plural predication.Thomas J. McKay - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

7 (#1,407,939)

6 months
7 (#486,539)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references