Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (2):269-273 (2001)

Authors
Basil Smith
Saddleback College
Abstract
In Morality Without Foundations, Mark Timmons argues that moral judgments (e.g. “cruelty is wrong”) have what he calls “evaluative assertoric content,” and so, are true or false. However, I argue that, even if correct, this argument renders moral truth or falsity mysterious.
Keywords Moral Realism  Moral Truth  Moral Contextualism  Moral Skepticism  Moral Twin Earth  Expressivism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1010301209296
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,920
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Contextualism and Moral Justification.Friderik Klampfer - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):569-582.
A Defense of Descriptive Moral Content.Jeff Wisdom - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (3):285-300.
Brogaard's Moral Contextualism.Lars Binderup - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):410–415.
Moral Contextualism and Moral Relativism.Berit Brogaard - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):385 - 409.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
95 ( #110,213 of 2,439,320 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,304 of 2,439,320 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes